Wuhan Lab Escape Can Explain Coronavirus More Easily, Says British Science Writer Nicholas Wade
New Delhi, May 21: Proponents of lab escape can explain all the available facts about SARS2 considerably more easily than can those who favor natural emergence, said Nicholas Wade, a science writer.
Writing in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, Wade said, ‘For the lab escape scenario, a Wuhan origin for the virus is a no-brainer. Wuhan is home to China’s leading center of coronavirus research where, as noted above, researchers were genetically engineering bat coronaviruses to attack human cells. They were doing so under the minimal safety conditions of a BSL2 lab. If a virus with the unexpected infectiousness of SARS2 had been generated there, its escape would be no surprise’.
‘It is clear that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was systematically constructing novel chimeric coronaviruses and was assessing their ability to infect human cells and human-ACE2-expressing mice,’ says Richard H. Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University and leading expert on biosafety. Home COVID-19 Testing Kits to Be Available in Market in Next 3-4 Days, Says ICMR.
Researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, led by China’s leading expert on bat viruses, Shi Zheng-li or ‘Bat Lady’, mounted frequent expeditions to the bat-infested caves of Yunnan in southern China and collected around a hundred different bat coronaviruses, Wade said. Mucormycosis in India: Centre Asks States to Notify Black Fungus Under Epidemic Diseases Act 1897.
Shi then teamed up with Ralph S. Baric, an eminent coronavirus researcher at the University of North Carolina. Their work focused on enhancing the ability of bat viruses to attack humans so as to ‘examine the emergence potential (that is, the potential to infect humans) of circulating bat CoVs [coronaviruses]’. Mucormycosis Scare in India: What Causes Mucormycosis and What Are Its Symptoms? How It Is Related With COVID-19? All You Need To Know About Black Fungus.
Wade said in pursuit of this aim, in November 2015 they created a novel virus by taking the backbone of the SARS1 virus and replacing its spike protein with one from a bat virus (known as SHC014-CoV). This manufactured virus was able to infect the cells of the human airway, at least when tested against a lab culture of such cells. Wade said natural emergence was the media’s preferred theory until around February 2021 and the visit by a World Health Organization (WHO) commission to China.
The commission’s composition and access were heavily controlled by the Chinese authorities. Its members, kept asserting before, during, and after their visit that lab escape was extremely unlikely. But this was not quite the propaganda victory the Chinese authorities may have been hoping for. What became clear was that the Chinese had no evidence to offer the commission in support of the natural emergence theory, Wade said.
This was surprising because both the SARS1 and MERS viruses had left copious traces in the environment. The intermediary host species of SARS1 was identified within four months of the epidemic’s outbreak, and the host of MERS within nine months.
‘Yet some 15 months after the SARS2 pandemic began, and after a presumably intensive search, Chinese researchers had failed to find either the original bat population, or the intermediate species to which SARS2 might have jumped, or any serological evidence that any Chinese population, including that of Wuhan, had ever been exposed to the virus prior to December 2019. Natural emergence remained a conjecture which, however plausible to begin with, had gained not a shred of supporting evidence in over a year,’ Wade said.
‘And as long as that remains the case, it’s logical to pay serious attention to the alternative conjecture, that SARS2 escaped from a lab,’ Wade said.
(The above story first appeared on Today News 24 on May 21, 2021 03:31 PM IST. For more news and updates on politics, world, sports, entertainment and lifestyle, log on to our website todaynews24.top).
