Liberal MP Anita Vandenbeld fell short of an apology Thursday after instigating a fracas Wednesday that led two witnesses testifying about violence against women to storm out of a parliamentary committee hearing.
Vandenbeld said only that she deeply regrets the “distress that this meeting caused the witnesses.”
The statement came after a domestic violence survivor demanded an apology from the MP for what she described as “abusive” behaviour.
“It’s not an apology — it’s a statement,” said Megan Walker, a witness who appeared before the committee.
“She has caused an entire community of women and girls who have faced abuse and are following this some distress, and that’s not acknowledged here.”
The rare summer meeting was scheduled to allow MPs to hear from advocates for domestic violence victims and a deputy chief of the Peel Region Police in light of several high-profile cases this summer.
It began with detailed testimony from Walker, an advocate for ending violence against women, and Cait Alexander, who shared with MPs graphic photos of abuse she suffered.
When given the floor, Vandenbeld accused Conservatives of playing politics with the trauma of survivors, putting together the agenda in haste and limiting the ability of other MPs to suggest witnesses.
She insisted that she cares about survivors’ stories and outlined some of the actions the federal government has taken to address violence against women.
During a stop in London, Ont. on Aug. 1, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh responds to a question about how two witnesses left a Commons committee hearing upset after a Liberal MP steered a planned discussion on violence against women toward the topic of abortion rights.
But rather than pivoting back to the topic of violence against women after airing that complaint, Vandenbeld called for a debate on a motion related to abortion rights — an issue the Liberals have tried to pin the Conservatives down on for months.
The witnesses shouted their frustration at Vandenbeld and others who voted for the motion, but they were effectively ignored for the rest of the meeting as MPs debated speaking orders, the Conservatives’ stance on abortion and the narrow scope of those called to testify.
Both witnesses eventually left the meeting in a visible state of distress.