Canada’s telecom regulator has rejected an application by Telus to charge some customers who pay their bill for a home phone line with a credit card.
The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) said Thursday it has rejected a recent application from the Calgary-based telecommunications provider to charge customers in remote areas of Alberta and B.C. a fee if they pay their bill for a landline with a credit card.
Telus first floated the idea in August, warning customers it would start charging a fee of up to 1.5 per cent to customers who paid their bills with a credit card. That was related to a recent settlement that allows merchants to pass on so-called interchange fees directly to customers.
Telus’s current fee applies on almost any service in any part of the country, but the company had to formally apply for the CRTC’s permission to do so for landline services in rural areas, since the regulator has jurisdiction over that.
Regulator not happy with fees
The telecom regulator sought input from the public on the plan, and more than 4,000 Canadians wrote in to share their views. The vast majority were against the plan.
So the CRTC rejected the fee request, but Telus still has carte blanche to levy the surcharge on bills for other services.
The regulator makes it clear, however, that it’s not pleased to see these fees coming in at all.
“While Telus didn’t need the CRTC’s approval to add the surcharge to its unregulated services, the CRTC is very concerned about this practice as it goes against affordability and consumer interest,” the regulator said, noting that the fees disproportionately hurt the most vulnerable consumers.
“The CRTC is sending a clear message to Telus and other telecommunications service providers that are thinking of imposing such a fee on their customers.”
The regular said that if the practice continues, it will consider all regulatory options.
“While Telus didn’t need the CRTC’s approval to add the surcharge to its unregulated services, the CRTC is very concerned about this practice as it goes against affordability and consumer interest.”
