24 x 7 World News

Some jack-in-the-pulpit plants may use sex to lure pollinators to their death

0

Fake тАФ and fatal тАФ invitations to romance could be the newest bit of trickery uncovered among some jack-in-the-pulpit wildflowers.

The fatal part isnтАЩt the surprise. Jack-in-the-pulpits (Arisaema) are the only plants known to kill their own insect pollinators as a matter of routine, says evolutionary ecologist Kenji Suetsugu of Kobe University in Japan. The new twist, if confirmed, would be using sexual deception to woo pollinators into the death traps.

Until now, biologists have found only three plant families with any species that pretend to offer sex to insects, Suetsugu says online March 28 in Plants, People, Planet. But unlike deceit in jack-in-the-pulpits, those other attractions arenтАЩt fatal, just phony.

The orchid family has turned out multiple cheats, some so seductive that a male insect leaves wasted sperm as well as pollen on a flower. Yet he doesnтАЩt get even a sip of nectar (SN: 3/5/08; SN: 3/27/08). Similar scams have turned up among daisies: A few dark bumps that a human in bad light might mistake for an insect can drive male flies to frenzies on the yellow, orange or red Gorteria petals. Enthusiasm wanes with repeated disappointment though (SN: 1/29/14). And among irises, a species dangles velvety purple petals where deluded insects wallow.

Ophrys speculum, Gorteria diffusa, Iris paradoxa
Until now, luring pollinators with false offers of insect sex has turned up in only three plant families. Hundreds of orchids cheat (including Ophrys speculum, left). So does a daisy with alluring insect-like petal bumps (Gorteria diffusa, middle) and an iris (Iris paradoxa, right) with some dark dangling petals.Steven Johnson (daisy) and Jorun Tharaldsen (orchid, iris) from D.C.J. Wong, J. Perkins and R. Peakall/Frontiers in Plant Science 2022

Two jack-in-the-pulpit species in Japan have now raised suspicions that their family, the arums, should be added to the list of sexual cheats. To visually oriented humans, the 180 or so Arisaema species look like just a merry reminder of evolutionтАЩs endless weirdness. Some kind of flappy canopy, sometimes striped, bends over a little cupped тАЬpulpitтАЭ with a pinkie-tip stub or mushroom bulge of plant flesh peeping over the rim. Below the rim, swaths of flowers open in succession тАФ male blooms overtaken by flowers with female parts тАФ as the plant grows from slim young jack to big mama.

These oddball flowers depend mostly on pollinators that deserve a much bigger fan base: fungus gnats. These gnats, small as punctuation marks and hard to identify, are true flies. But donтАЩt hold that against them. They donтАЩt stalk picnic spreads or buzz-thump against windows. Pollinating gnats тАЬare very frail,тАЭ Suetsugu says, and their wings make no noise a human can hear.

Nor can a human always smell what draws fungus gnats. ItтАЩs clear, though, that the varied canopied pulpits can have a strong happy hour lure for those cruising pollinators looking to meet the right gnat. This will go terribly wrong.

A tiny escape hatch deep in the trap stays open during the male phase of flowering, but that two-millimeter hole vanishes during the big mama stage. A gnat canтАЩt overcome the slippery, flaking wax of the plantтАЩs inner wall to climb out. ┬аSo any gnat tricked twice is doomed.

Biologists had assumed that jack-in-the-pulpits seeking fungus gnats were perfuming the air with mushroomy, nice-place-to-have-kids scents. Many kinds seem to do so, but homey smells donтАЩt explain an odd observation by Suetsugu and his colleagues. Of the important pollinator species for two Japanese jack-in-the-pulpits (A. angustatum and A. peninsulae), almost all the specks found in the traps were males.

An odor lure targeting males might mimic a come-hither scent of female gnats, the researchers propose. ThatтАЩs outright fraud. Even if the hopeful males find a mate in the waxy green dungeon, they and their offspring would starve. TheyтАЩre stuck in a plant with no fungus to eat. Whatever that ruinous scent is, a human nose can barely detect it, Suetsugu reports.

The notion that biologists have so far overlooked a scent important to other animals seems тАЬmore than possibleтАЭ to Kelsey J.R.P. Byers of the John Innes Centre in Norwich, England. ByersтАЩ work overturned a common assumption that monkeyflowers (Mimulus) had no scent even though hawkmoths, flying at night and known to track odors, visit the flowers.

тАЬWeтАЩre such visual creatures,тАЭ says Byers, who studies floral scents. We can laugh at how insects mistake some off-color blob of plant tissue for a fabulous female, but weтАЩre missing the odors. Fungus gnats, however, even look like the citizens of a smellier world, with giant guy-style antennae тАЬlike an ostrich plume on a hat.тАЭ

At least now, modern analytical lab techniques and equipment are opening up the vast sensory world of communication wafting around us. To see if even familiar plants like jack-in-the-pulpits are up to something odd, scientists need to identify the lure itself. Then maybe weтАЩll understand the irresistible valentine scent of a female fungus gnat.

Leave a Reply